Thursday, November 21, 2019
MID-TERM CASE STUDY Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words
MID-TERM - Case Study Example ustice and Fidelity (Miller and Davis, 1996).In this case , the main problem is to choose a person who will contribute to the development of the company and at the same time leads to change, empowerment and transformation. If Liz is selected, she will be the first African female woman manager and can do average performance with high energy level. It will also help her personally a lot. Roy, a white person has sacrificed even his family for the company while his performance is average to low. He has twenty years experience. Quahââ¬â¢s performance level is high but she will go to any extent for reaching her goals and her experience is also low. She is very bold as evident from her previous experience. In this case, the principle of autonomy means that the candidate needs to be independent and the candidate needs to make clear and rational decisions. Based on this principle, Liz and Quang are the top candidates. This is because Royââ¬â¢s son has got engaged with vice presidentââ¬â¢s daughter, which seemed like a company affair to get promotion for Roy. Hence, Roy cannot be considered as a best candidate according to the principle of autonomy. Based on the principle of Nonmaleficence, the decision should not do any intentional harm to others (Kitchener, 1984; Rosenbaum, 1982; Stadler, 1986; Forester-Miller & Rubenstein, 1992). Liz is the best person based on this principle. Based on the principle of beneficence, the decision needs to contribute to the welfare of the person. This is because of her personal commitments and financial problems According to this principle also, Liz is the best candidate. The principle of justice means that treating as equal with their differences and able to give a rationale for the difference in treatment (Kitchener, 1984). According to this principle also, Liz is the best candidate. ââ¬Å"Fidelity means loyalty, faithfulness and honouring commitmentsâ⬠(Miller and Davis, 1996, p2).Based on this principle, Roy and Quang are the best
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.